How a family holiday redefined my understanding of modernist literature

I am a person who says ‘Kafkaesque’ with alarming frequency. If a bank statement arrives by post rather than email, it’s Kafkaesque. If my mobile rings and it shows as a sales call from, say, Rotherham, a town I’ve never been to, it’s Kafkaesque. And clearly if anyone uninvited comes to the door, phones, or even emails me, it’s deeply Kafkaesque. If the prime minister is on TV a lot, Kafkaesque. If a monarch is on the news, it’s equally suspect. If I can’t get into a nightclub, it’s all very Kafkaesque. Perhaps it’s for this reason I haven’t been to a nightclub for about ten years, a result of those Kafkaesque door policies, rather than the woeful state of my trainers. Kafkaesque has long been one of my go-to terms for anything which smacks of paranoia-inducing bureaucracy or ominous coincidence. I say, ‘one of my go-to terms’ for this. Actually I have several but that’s another story.
Indeed my comfortable straight CIS white male middle-class life in the UK is sooooooooo Kafkaesque, for this reason I was delighted and relieved to be able to share my borrowed worldview with family from abroad, as we travelled to Prague, once home to that famous writer, for fittingly Kafkaesque reasons. Let me explain, I was visiting said city with my wife, our child, and my open-minded in-law parents. These in-laws live in Delhi and so needed a Schengen Visa this summer in order for the rest of us to holiday somewhere off this blighted isle in the North Sea. But get this! The only visa they were able to get in time was for the Czech Republic, so we kicked off a ten-day European holiday with a four day stay in Prague. I couldn’t begin to tell them how much this odd quirk of European immigration policy had felt to me, very distinctly, like a juridical summons. And yes, I have been taking my tablets.
Pretty soon we were sat in a meat-and-beer-focussed restaurant with a distant view of the castle to which K attempted, with only partial success as I remember it, to gain admittance in Kafka’s novel The Castle. And from our pavement table I could well see his predicament. Prague climbs, angular roof by roof, in cubist fashion from street level and tramline to the elevated perch of its former rulers. As I tucked into my goulash, I could see many ways in which it presents the eye with topographical challenges that are at once architectural and metaphysical. And as my eyes clambered up to this walled seat of authority which can’t have been more than a kilometre away, is it fair to say I felt the pitiless gaze of a nameless authority. Eyes turned back on me and my unsuspecting loved ones.
There seemed little way to explain this irrational feeling. But I felt an urgent need to pass it on somehow. So I lobbied for a visit to a whole museum devoted to Kafka where I felt that I might bequeath some of my paranoid worldview to Prof D, Little A, Nanu and Nani (as I will call my family members, for the sake of anonymity rather than literary conceit). I wanted to share. I wanted to be understood. I wanted to be a guide, so help me. But it was always something of a vain hope. Prof D, my wife, is a rationalist and a logician. Little A, while admittedly showing an interest in the fantastical premise of The Metamorphosis, is also far too sensible to attribute too much importance to worldly coincidence. Nanu, my father in-law, has literally written three books about positive thinking, rather than negative determinism. And Nani, my mother-in-law, whose number one hobby is prayer, would not be likely to recognise to the depressingly finite universe of K and his associates.
The Kafka Museum opened in 2005. In a city chiefly known for beer, a bridge and medieval, animatronic clock, it provides a valiant focal point for those interested in Prague’s literary heritage. By the time we had reached the museum, beer, bridge and clock had all been duly experienced. My four Prague neophytes had got a feel for the maze-like city planning, the weight of history in the medieval old town, and the precarity of a stable existence in the long-contested governance of the Czech part of central Europe. They were primed to wake up transformed, if not into beetles as such, then at least into fans of modernist literature (I should point out that my wife, Prof D, was in actual fact not not a fan. She has indeed read some Kafka, but woe betide me if I ever wake up beside her claiming to be a cockroach).
Prof D took it all in, therefore. The vintage photos, the early film, the sepia letters caught like insects in large vitrines. As I read these letters side by side with my wife (a feminist who works in academia on the topic of gender) I began to nervously realise that my hero Kafka was something of a player. I knew that he was in correspondence with a handful of women. But on the evidence assembled here – photos I was seeing for the first time – they were all three smoking hot, in a fin-de-siècle stylee. And the selective edit and translation here of Kafka’s ardent letters (the museum holds so many!) suggested he wasn’t quite as cripplingly shy as I had assumed from my own previous, and apparently blind, reading of his entire epistolary output. Yes, I ploughed through them all in the 90s. So if these buttoned up babes were on social media today, yer boy Franz would be so far gone into their DMs that I doubt any other writing of any sort would have got done. I looked at Prof D with trepidation. Would she decide that in our house we simply cancel the term Kafkaesque?
Prof D was, I realised with awful clarity, undertaking a full academic investigation of Kafka’s appeal to a person like me. And indeed, thanks to her I was making note more and more ways in which Kafka was coming to appear to me less and less Kafka like as the visit went on. He was, it now appeared, a bona fide professional when it came to the notary business, a model worker and a legal bro if you will. Prague may be in the historical region of Bohemia, but K had very little to do with the values we now call Bohemian. Kafka was more in debt to Jewish traditions such as Kabbalah, and… he had daddy issues. Prof D was drinking all this in. This place surely offered the chance to rebut her husband’s most oft misused epithet.
But another part of the museum was on more familiar ground. This was an L-shaped gallery, resembling a corridor of power, which held wall to wall filing cabinets. Certain of these were open to reveal first editions, manuscripts and other texts sacred to a fan of Kafka. Here were also vintage telephones, which connected to sonorous voices reading Kafka down the line. It would be terrifying, so went my reassuring thought, to pick up a ringing phone and receive an earful of The Trial. (All landlines are vintage now, it should be noted. At home I got rid of ours since the only callers were the network provider trying to upsell us product and angrily insistent scammers trying to access my laptop. I feel, as already stated, that Prague’s most famous son might have understood.)
But while we had been losing ourselves in visions of old Prague, Nanu, Nani and Little A had been out in the sunshine waiting patiently for this strange museum to exhaust our interest. Seems like it hadn’t worked. Neither my wife’s parents or our daughter had caught the vibe of laugh-out-loud guilt and paranoia which I’d hoped to inspire them with. Instead, Little A was suddenly to pronounce, “That’s absolutely disgusting!” I followed her gaze. Across the courtyard was a sculpture by David Černy which I swear had nothing to do with Kafka. Due to a charming water feature, two life-size male figures in tarnished bronze were engaged in a continuous pissing contest while a lake, the shape of the Czech republic formed around their ankles. It repulsed all four of my companions with good reason, who will doubtless now forever associate modernist literature with bodily excretions. (Hmmm, might work for Joyce).
Okay, so words on a page were found to pale beside an indelible visual image. Maybe, just maybe, thought I, a visit to the very castle which inspired The Castle will evoke the miserable hilarity of K’s life in a way that this museum, with its letters and printed material was always bound to fail to do. We planned for a whole day at this UNESCO World Heritage Site. In fact, it’s not a castle, it’s a walled village. A reasonably priced ticket afforded entrance to a harmonious romanesque basilica, a vaulting gothic cathedral, a more or less neoclassical palace and a medieval shopping street. At no time were we approached by strange characters, no doors were closed in our faces, and in no way did I feel that Kafka’s real life castle was withholding anything from us. After climbing more than 200 steps to reach the arched entrance it was disappointingly easy to access, not Kafkaesque at all.
In fact, having reminded the assembled party that this castle had a namesake in one of Kafka’s three famous novels, I began to worry that for Little A, Nanu, Nani and even Prof D, the term which I found so useful for evoking a sense of semi-mystical social control was coming to mean nothing but joining long queues and shuffling around churches. However, I also noted that the layout of these buildings was weirdly ad hoc. The cathedral cut across the vast square at a diagonal to all notions of common sense. This was a hint of sinisterly planned randomness that we were at least able to share.
In fact we did enjoy a bit of architectural dissonance on this trip; It caught the mood, because our four day city break included a sunset drink on the roof terrace of a building in an apparent state of drunken collapse. This was the fabulous nine-storey Dancing House, an office designed by Frank Gehry. It won the hearts and minds of my beloved fam where some more obscure literary motifs – hunger artists, cockroaches, and protagonists accused of nameless crimes – had failed. Our views across the Vitava River and the traffic ticking around across many bridges evoked a city where, life simply goes on, and Kafkaism is not really an everyday problem for the people who live here. It is just a concern for pretentious, ostentatious name droppers who once studied a little bit of literature and who try to dress up their otherwise totally pampered and charmed lives with gratuitous displays of existential pain. Whoever they may be.
Pain had so little to do with our stay in the city. Good food, yes. Sensational beer, yes, of course. But pain? No. Not until the very final moments. It was 10.00 AM and the five of us were on a street corner by the hotel ordering up an Uber ride. There was a train due to take us to Vienna at 11.00 AM. Reader, you know it’s annoying when the little toy car on the map in the app fails to move in your direction, and then it suddenly does, but then again changes direction, and it goes round in a little circle, and you cancel the first car, but then your next driver preforms the very same wiggle-dance all around the twisty streets of this unfamiliar city, and you cancel another ride, and a third driver does the same, and when the fourth driver comes you have most likely missed your train because a fifteen minute journey is now showing up on the app as likely to take half an hour. Then you reach the station. The train is delayed by ten minutes and you run, the lot of you, burdened down with cases like so much metaphorical emotional baggage, and you reach the platform and bravely up ahead there is Little A remonstrating with a conductor and the five of you clear the escalator and arrive on the platform just as the train, begins to move. That.
“Wow,” said Little A, “that’s not good”.
“Yes,” I agreed, guiltily, “It’s not even pre-ordained bad luck this time”.
The five of us turned around reluctantly and made our way to the ticket office to try and get a re-issue or a refund or replacements or anything which would get us on the next train out of Prague. We had no joy whatsoever with the representative of Czech railways. She was, indeed, like a brick wall dead end at the end of a complex labyrinth.
But I couldn’t even say it. Me, a person who dropped Kafkaesque into every conceivable scenario, couldn’t find a word for it. At breakfast, for some reason, I’d decreed we didn’t need to prebook a taxi from the hotel reception. My bad. I had come to Prague in search of Kafka. I had found instead the consequences of my own carelessness. It was I guess Marksheerinesque. Apologies to both sides of my family, but what a trip!
If you enjoyed this in anyway, please share in any way. Comments also welcome, I’ll try to respond to them all!!!!











